You see, this is why reviews are so good. On reminded me in a comment, on your gullible Next door, on Measles.
I was so angry when I wrote that post that I did not for my life could remember measles. I knew it was a disease I was particularly upset, but I remembered the hell not what it was. With Ridge comments fell into place.
On the commentary says, and I forwards it simply because I trust Oh, that some kindergartens in the Stockholm area, children's groups where the group immunity is as low as 70%. She also addresses the important issue of those parents with unvaccinated children probably do not have any problem with taking their children with them on holidays abroad to countries where tra ; sslingen still kills children, and then bring their kids back to children's groups for team immunity collapsed. Thanks for that.
the unvaccinated population is not separated from the rest of us - they're out there every day. Coughing, sneezing and touching doorknobs with sticky hands. At best, they give us a cold or the FLU ...
The first scapegoat in Autism Vs. Vaccination was MMR-syringe. MMR stands for Mumps, Measles, Rubella: Mumps, measles and rubella for us mortals. And it is also MMR syringe worst affected. It is particularly Mumps, measles and rubella as Your Neighbor gullible think that your kid can take.
Your Neighbor gullible believe that autism has "exploded" during nållnålltalet. Let's look at it: 1998 was the criteria for autism, so that the state previously covered under other diagnoses / syndromes / conditions som tex. Mental retardering och vissa inlärningssvårigheter numera går under autismspektrat.
Efter detta ökade, inte förvånande, antalet autism-diagnoser. Det hade kanske varit signifikant om inte antalet barn som diagnosticerades med de numera kriterie-minskade diagnoserna minskade i exakt samma omfattning. Antivaxxarna som älskar att se kausalitet där det finns korrelationer (med samma logik kan man konstatera att en oproportionerligt stor del av patientgruppen som får cellgiftsbehandling avlider) har for some reason not bitten itself in this piece of statistics.
Those who get their children diagnosed in the autism spectrum often respond to sit down and learn everything they can about it. Some notes on which this apparently statistically significant increase in autism incidence, which of course is perceived as disturbing. Being this öknig must have a cause - or? The reason could be: "more is included in the spectrum now" is not enough dramatically, for those who are so INCLINE. And who might have difficulty accepting their children like it is.
One of my pet subjects of late is that we often refuse to meet people where they are, but persist in wanting to face them where we think they should be. Peer pressure plays a specific function to prevent us from committing stupid acts, but its back is that it often allows the craziest to define reality. It is by Tage Danielsson said: "That certainly is not wise." Therefore, it is easily done to those who doubt their own convictions, often set the agenda. For the rest of us are reasonable. It is not ideal, but what do you do?
It is therefore doctors do not have to print the placebo - which drives desperate people to seek help from homeopaths - who have no scruples against selling water and sugar for 6000sek quart for people with severe asthma. That is why we as a society can not force our gullible neighbors to immunize their children. If your gullible neighbor was in your situation, he or she would undoubtedly require that the police took your child and forced vaccinated it. Be sure of that. It is precisely because we can not. For that we are not like them. And it makes use of the to place your child in danger.
2002, the New England Journal of Medicine a study on 500 000 (https: / / content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/347/19 / 1477) Danish children born between 1991 and 1998. The information came from the Psychiatric Central Register, where information on all children who received no diagnosis is and all children born in Denmark between 1991 and 1998 were studied.
study is a bit more complicated than what I am going to make it sound, but in brief, was that they compared the portion of the population who had not received any vaccinations to those who have been vaccinated, specifically with MMR. The unvaccinated children were obviously reduced in number since the unvaccinated people in Denmark: thankfully, is less than number vaccinated so far. However, the study showed that in the population with a diagnosis of autism spectrum represented the unvaccinated children and the vaccinated children exactly equal shares of their respective populations. In percentage terms there was no difference.
To explain: 500,000 is a large population. In clinical studies included a population of 1000 patients with a fairly large study. It is because we in Scandinavia are central registers for this way that it is possible to do this kind of investigations. A similar study in the United States, for example, föreställerjag me, if not impossible, then at least infinitely more complicated to do. (And expensive. Did I say expensive?)
2007, enlightening WHO, killed 197 000 people - mostly children under five years of ; lders - of measles. Measles is still one of the most common causes of death for children. The majority of these children have not had access to Measles Vaccine due to poverty, or because they live in countries where it is difficult to reach out to people with medical on ; Measures. While WHO is struggling to get the vaccination rate in the third world, Jenny McCarthy is fighting to get them down in the western world. She has to and even said openly that she hopes that there will be a measles outbreak that Onda big pharma have to develop a safer vaccine. (A catch-22 because it is not possible to develop a vaccine that causes less autism, because the vaccine in question are causing autism zero.) What she actually says which is that she wishes to break user group immunity so that other children will die (her son's vaccinations - that's why she is - which makes it less likely that he would just emphasize with. For that's not what she hopes for? Imagine what books and Oprah-visit it would be.) That compel commercial firms to change the substance, which is not present in their vaccines, against one another as does not cause autism, thus giving her a sense of self-righteousness and satisfaction. When I feel the need for self-righteousness and satisfaction, I usually pick up trash after the second and drinking coffee. Everyone's needs are different. I blame it on Norma Rae. Americans always want to be the Norma Rae. Fucking Sally Field.
I take it again: Jenny McCarthy want your, or your gullible neighbor, children should die to support her cause. With only a measles epidemic would prove would be that people still die from measles? When the only factor we know increases the risk of autism is that the mother suffer from measles during pregnancy? Irony-arc: a vaccinated mother had in that particular case made a difference. Nothing else we know makes a difference. We could spend money on looking for better treatments and better explanatory models, but no - we will chase a ghost in the bottle instead. For Mom is on a quest!
Mumps after puberty may make young men sterile. Red Dog after puberty can do young women sterile. Measles can kill anyone, but especially children and the elderly.
Antivaxxarna are not even agree on what the vaccines as "causing" problems. First it was MMR until they discovered that no one had an MMR injection with the (microscopic and harmless amount) of mercury since about 2000th Where did those woo-wooiter always do: they moved the goalposts. Changed the subject in a double sense - in this case that Thimerosal also contained the ethyl mercury - up to 2002. When it became apparent that Thimerosal could not have caused their child's autism just moved the goalposts again, and now is the order in which the vaccination is given which has been targeted ... Anything rather than admit that there is not any reliable support for an incorrect hypothesis.
It is Therefore, overconfidence is one of those horrible hydra. Man chops off a head, with a sword forged from rigorous logic, correct execution of studies and facts in order to immediately see a new head to grow up and attack the paint on the sword. You get tired. You get migraines. You start over.
Mom - now I speak in particular to you - I have been to me that you have told if a school friend who had polio, but I can mix up the stories.
Salk vaccine was announced to the world in April 1955, so then you must have already been to school. I can imagine it took a while to get it out to people too.
point is that there are plenty of people who are not much older than sixty, who remembers and can tell you about Poliomyelitis. How to save their mothers were. The invention of the piles of leaves flourished to create a sense of security. How school friends disappeared from the classrooms and sometimes returned on crutches or in wheelchairs, and sometimes not returning at all. I think we need to hear Polio-stories. I think it's important.
In the case of autism so we do not know yet what is happening there, but most of the time - as in: most reliable studies - suggests that autism is either congenital, or upstår in vitro by a hitherto unknown cause. The most likely scenario is that it is in the package well before the person in question draws its first breath. Long before he or she is vaccinated. I can vividly imagine how frustrating it is to have an explanation - just a "Here's the deal with this. We do not know why and we can not do. Good luck. "I understand that. But I do not understand why you want to kill other people's children to justify their child's existence. The piece I just do not understand.
Nor I understand how to use the argument that has emerged from a man who believes that Obama won the presidential election because he "hypnotized people to reed , first at him "... Yes, I know: attack the argument and not the foliemössade paranoiac who argue, but what the hell? Someone moderation may it be?
0 comments:
Post a Comment