Nadine Jensen Breastfeeding

Hot vaxx, revisited.

You see, this is why reviews are so good. On reminded me in a comment, on your gullible Next door, on Measles.

I was so angry when I wrote that post that I did not for my life could remember measles. I knew it was a disease I was particularly upset, but I remembered the hell not what it was. With Ridge comments fell into place.

On the commentary says, and I forwards it simply because I trust Oh, that some kindergartens in the Stockholm area, children's groups where the group immunity is as low as 70%. She also addresses the important issue of those parents with unvaccinated children probably do not have any problem with taking their children with them on holidays abroad to countries where tra ; sslingen still kills children, and then bring their kids back to children's groups for team immunity collapsed. Thanks for that.

the unvaccinated population is not separated from the rest of us - they're out there every day. Coughing, sneezing and touching doorknobs with sticky hands. At best, they give us a cold or the FLU ...

The first scapegoat in Autism Vs. Vaccination was MMR-syringe. MMR stands for Mumps, Measles, Rubella: Mumps, measles and rubella for us mortals. And it is also MMR syringe worst affected. It is particularly Mumps, measles and rubella as Your Neighbor gullible think that your kid can take.

Your Neighbor gullible believe that autism has "exploded" during nållnålltalet. Let's look at it: 1998 was the criteria for autism, so that the state previously covered under other diagnoses / syndromes / conditions som tex. Mental retardering och vissa inlärningssvårigheter numera går under autismspektrat.

 

Efter detta ökade, inte förvånande, antalet autism-diagnoser. Det hade kanske varit signifikant om inte antalet barn som diagnosticerades med de numera kriterie-minskade diagnoserna minskade i exakt samma omfattning. Antivaxxarna som älskar att se kausalitet där det finns korrelationer (med samma logik kan man konstatera att en oproportionerligt stor del av patientgruppen som får cellgiftsbehandling avlider) har for some reason not bitten itself in this piece of statistics.

Those who get their children diagnosed in the autism spectrum often respond to sit down and learn everything they can about it. Some notes on which this apparently statistically significant increase in autism incidence, which of course is perceived as disturbing. Being this öknig must have a cause - or? The reason could be: "more is included in the spectrum now" is not enough dramatically, for those who are so INCLINE. And who might have difficulty accepting their children like it is.

One of my pet subjects of late is that we often refuse to meet people where they are, but persist in wanting to face them where we think they should be. Peer pressure plays a specific function to prevent us from committing stupid acts, but its back is that it often allows the craziest to define reality. It is by Tage Danielsson said: "That certainly is not wise." Therefore, it is easily done to those who doubt their own convictions, often set the agenda. For the rest of us are reasonable. It is not ideal, but what do you do?

It is therefore doctors do not have to print the placebo - which drives desperate people to seek help from homeopaths - who have no scruples against selling water and sugar for 6000sek quart for people with severe asthma. That is why we as a society can not force our gullible neighbors to immunize their children. If your gullible neighbor was in your situation, he or she would undoubtedly require that the police took your child and forced vaccinated it. Be sure of that. It is precisely because we can not. For that we are not like them. And it makes use of the to place your child in danger.

2002, the New England Journal of Medicine a study on 500 000 (https: / / content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/347/19 / 1477) Danish children born between 1991 and 1998. The information came from the Psychiatric Central Register, where information on all children who received no diagnosis is and all children born in Denmark between 1991 and 1998 were studied.

study is a bit more complicated than what I am going to make it sound, but in brief, was that they compared the portion of the population who had not received any vaccinations to those who have been vaccinated, specifically with MMR. The unvaccinated children were obviously reduced in number since the unvaccinated people in Denmark: thankfully, is less than number vaccinated so far. However, the study showed that in the population with a diagnosis of autism spectrum represented the unvaccinated children and the vaccinated children exactly equal shares of their respective populations. In percentage terms there was no difference.

To explain: 500,000 is a large population. In clinical studies included a population of 1000 patients with a fairly large study. It is because we in Scandinavia are central registers for this way that it is possible to do this kind of investigations. A similar study in the United States, for example, föreställerjag me, if not impossible, then at least infinitely more complicated to do. (And expensive. Did I say expensive?)

2007, enlightening WHO, killed 197 000 people - mostly children under five years of ; lders - of measles. Measles is still one of the most common causes of death for children. The majority of these children have not had access to Measles Vaccine due to poverty, or because they live in countries where it is difficult to reach out to people with medical on ; Measures. While WHO is struggling to get the vaccination rate in the third world, Jenny McCarthy is fighting to get them down in the western world. She has to and even said openly that she hopes that there will be a measles outbreak that Onda big pharma have to develop a safer vaccine. (A catch-22 because it is not possible to develop a vaccine that causes less autism, because the vaccine in question are causing autism zero.) What she actually says which is that she wishes to break user group immunity so that other children will die (her son's vaccinations - that's why she is - which makes it less likely that he would just emphasize with. For that's not what she hopes for? Imagine what books and Oprah-visit it would be.) That compel commercial firms to change the substance, which is not present in their vaccines, against one another as does not cause autism, thus giving her a sense of self-righteousness and satisfaction. When I feel the need for self-righteousness and satisfaction, I usually pick up trash after the second and drinking coffee. Everyone's needs are different. I blame it on Norma Rae. Americans always want to be the Norma Rae. Fucking Sally Field.

I take it again: Jenny McCarthy want your, or your gullible neighbor, children should die to support her cause. With only a measles epidemic would prove would be that people still die from measles? When the only factor we know increases the risk of autism is that the mother suffer from measles during pregnancy? Irony-arc: a vaccinated mother had in that particular case made a difference. Nothing else we know makes a difference. We could spend money on looking for better treatments and better explanatory models, but no - we will chase a ghost in the bottle instead. For Mom is on a quest!

Mumps after puberty may make young men sterile. Red Dog after puberty can do young women sterile. Measles can kill anyone, but especially children and the elderly.

Antivaxxarna are not even agree on what the vaccines as "causing" problems. First it was MMR until they discovered that no one had an MMR injection with the (microscopic and harmless amount) of mercury since about 2000th Where did those woo-wooiter always do: they moved the goalposts. Changed the subject in a double sense - in this case that Thimerosal also contained the ethyl mercury - up to 2002. When it became apparent that Thimerosal could not have caused their child's autism just moved the goalposts again, and now is the order in which the vaccination is given which has been targeted ... Anything rather than admit that there is not any reliable support for an incorrect hypothesis.

It is Therefore, overconfidence is one of those horrible hydra. Man chops off a head, with a sword forged from rigorous logic, correct execution of studies and facts in order to immediately see a new head to grow up and attack the paint on the sword. You get tired. You get migraines. You start over.

Mom - now I speak in particular to you - I have been to me that you have told if a school friend who had polio, but I can mix up the stories.

Salk vaccine was announced to the world in April 1955, so then you must have already been to school. I can imagine it took a while to get it out to people too.

point is that there are plenty of people who are not much older than sixty, who remembers and can tell you about Poliomyelitis. How to save their mothers were. The invention of the piles of leaves flourished to create a sense of security. How school friends disappeared from the classrooms and sometimes returned on crutches or in wheelchairs, and sometimes not returning at all. I think we need to hear Polio-stories. I think it's important.

In the case of autism so we do not know yet what is happening there, but most of the time - as in: most reliable studies - suggests that autism is either congenital, or upstår in vitro by a hitherto unknown cause. The most likely scenario is that it is in the package well before the person in question draws its first breath. Long before he or she is vaccinated. I can vividly imagine how frustrating it is to have an explanation - just a "Here's the deal with this. We do not know why and we can not do. Good luck. "I understand that. But I do not understand why you want to kill other people's children to justify their child's existence. The piece I just do not understand.

Nor I understand how to use the argument that has emerged from a man who believes that Obama won the presidential election because he "hypnotized people to reed , first at him "... Yes, I know: attack the argument and not the foliemössade paranoiac who argue, but what the hell? Someone moderation may it be?

Purposely Rude Restaurant Chicago

In a very special episode of Kappa.

We have had visits by the world's most unsuccessful thief. As we stayed at B Rd, there has been trouble-prone and trouble-prone outside our window. The reason is probably that we are located midway between Rgates all pubs and a bit larigt area on the other side of us. Quite often begins the hysterical fracas between full fjårtis-girls and their twenty something boyfriends somewhere around Thursday afternoon and continues at least on Sunday night.

Monday morning I go to work and notes on the way to Eric's bike cover is gone.

WTF?

Who steals a bike cover? Seriously? It is an inexpensive coated nylon. It is a bit broken since I tried to pull it over the bike in trouble and accidentally pull one of kardborreremarna. At least two seagulls have defecated on the local and cats tend to fight revistrider means drawing on the accession. (Thus, it is _mycket_ cat pee on the lower parts of this coating. Very.)

Yet someone felt it worthwhile to steal it.

Perhaps it was someone drunk and locked out past the man. Ignored my second hand bike that was without protection, with a worse lock, and went straight at Erik's Bike trapped in an iron fence with both head and motorcycle chain. Realizing that it was too hard locked to provide transportation to a mate and instead stole the cover to protect themselves against the rain. Maybe living the time of writing a new life as impromptu tent in the dog park. The protection may be sufficient for the bikes, but nylon is more frequent than that, like a cheap tent, permeable to moisture which are firmly reach ; something.

I see before me how the thief wakes up in the bushes in the dog park, hung over, wet and stinking of cat pee. An evocative picture of how crime does not pay.

Besides, I have long thought that Erik's bike should have a new cover because the loose band allows the flaps in the enervating oupphö ANNUAL wind that comes with living on the coast (not to mention that it is kattkissigt), so what the thief actually did was to save myself the job to do of it.

Perhaps the most pointless crime in criminal history.

And a very typical picture of living in Rgate. - Especially on our street. People steal and in passing under the motto: "Hey, that was not nailed down!" When we moved in there were two massive terracotta pot with well-tended geraniums on stairs. We noted that they were attached to the railing with wire and padlocks. And it stopped the theft of the pots. Instead had someone, a drunken night when we stayed there a couple of months, torn up geranium from the pot and thrown them into the neighbor's basement stairs. As you do.

We are split on this. Since we live one floor up, it is not as likely to me we personally affected by all this vandalism (other than missing bike cover). We love the apartment, but getting tired of the area. While we are sick sick of moving. What do you do?

Stuff Covering My Clitorius

Why your gullible neighbor is lethal.

Your gullible neighbor believes that vaccinations can make children autistic. (Some gullible neighbors believe that God does not want them to vaccinate their children - for whatever reason, they are equally stupid in the head and deserves no children) Your gullible neighbor think the fact that autism is usually detected at about the same age as you get vaccinations means that vaccinations cause autism. Your gullible neighbor is too stupid to understand that autism was there all along, but had not noticed until you are two or three of the , r old. Your gullible neighbor decides not to vaccinate. For your gullible neighbor has heard that mercury is used as bevaringsmedel of the vaccine, and is no mercury so it is another heavy metal or toxin. Your gullible neighbor could easily ask their doctors what is in the vaccine, and be told that no mercury is present, but where's the fun in that?

Your gullible neighbor is stupid, and puts _ditt_ children in mortal danger. "Why?" You ask. "My neighbor might is stupid, but my child is vaccinated so what difference does it make if my neighbor's unvaccinated kid dragging home TB, polio and whooping cough? "

It matters to why the vaccine works is something called group-immunity. Every individual is responsible not to the vaccine and are not protected by it and it is impossible to know in advance who do not respond to it. There are also people who for various reasons not _kan_ vaccinated, and the reasons are not with their parents' low IQ to do but with autoimmune diseases, the ones we have not been vaccinated against. That we almost extinct scarlet fever, for example, because a sufficient number of vaccinated themselves, so they are not protected by vaccine protected by all the others are protected by the vaccine. The virus has nowhere to go: it killed mercilessly in nine out of ten the immune system and can not spread to the next individual.

Vaccine is, very simply put, disarmed viruses that teaches your immune system to kick the shit out more of the same. All immune system can not handle this. They rely on group-immunity. It is your neighbor's stupidity potentially deadly for your child. If your child is one of those children whose immune systems politely look at the vaccine viruses are and say "Welcome sir, I hope you'll like" so it is important to crap your neighbor's children have not gullible parents.

remember somebody Jenny McCarthy? Seventy chord and remember her as "some chick who drove videos in MTV's infancy" - some are aware that she is going out with Jim Carrey. But what she is above all, is stupid. When her son showed up odd behavior she decided immediately that she was an Indigo Mom and that he was a Crystal Child. They were, like, the next step in human evolution. A kind of New Age Über People in the fine old woo-woo-Nazi spirit. She did what any self-respecting Hollywood Mom does when she discovers she has a special child: she wrote several books about it, started a group for the future of people went to see Oprah and told us about their wonderful children. When therefore he was diagnosed with autism (a diagnosis that has been questioned since his symptoms are very similar to a disease who misdiagnosed as autism more often than the right is diagnosed, and which is treatable) can be understood that she was disappointed.

We know that autism mothers are perhaps a bit difficult to understand McCarthy's breaking over this - no one autism mom I know can afford to namely breaking down. No one autism mom I know has a need to justify their child's existence in the eyes of others. But Jenny McCarthy decided that the vaccine was the culprit and big pharma would be hunted to the last drop of blood. So she did what any self-respecting Hollywood Mom does when she suspects that her special child was special than she thought because big nasty corporation: she wrote several books about it, formed an association for parents whose children have been autistic from vaccinations to visit Oprah and talked about it.

But she has already lost interest in that too. The next step in her mother-crusade is that a "cure" her son. Yep, autism moms out there. If you just dried bother you, you would know that autism is possible to train away. Yes sir, for it has made Jenny McCarthy with her son, who by now is so special that there is no stopping it: imagine themselves to be born as next step in evolution, development of autism and then be healed from the - is it a phenomenon, or is it?

Jenny McCarthy's son has made tremendous progress. Funnily enough with a "new" treatment that is awfully similar to the old treatment for the disease that so often misdiagnosed as autism. Funny coincidence that.

So, Jenny McCarthy did what any self-respecting Hollywood Mom does when she cured her former crystal-son from autism: she is - all together now: wrote several books about it, started an association for parents who want to cure their children ques n autism and greeted Oprah and talked about it. (And still stubbornly claims that he became ill due to vaccine and operating an anti-vaccine lobby in the U.S.)

And the best thing for Jenny McCarthy, if not com r her son, is that there is at least one book, compound and an Oprah appearance last one milking from it all. I am convinced that within a few years will see Jenny McCarthy to write several books about having a child misdiagnosed with autism in the disqualification of the book have a treatable disease, start a club for people who had their children misdiagnosed as autistic and health on Oprah and talk about it.

But not until "Her" treatment has fallen off the bestseller list probably. You have to pay rent too.

Idiots like Jenny McCarthy convince your gullible neighbor not to vaccinate their children, and then flutter to the next excuse, while your neighbor is there with their unvaccinated children and exposes not only his own children, but also your, life and limb.

Vaccineringssifrorna in Sweden falls annually. We are approaching the limits of immunity when the group no longer holds. This UK we have already had the death of 'extinct' diseases such as Rubella, Polio, Measles and Mumps. In some areas of London are vaccination rates less than 40% (Group Immunity reach around 90%).

vaccination as a preventive measure has worked for all of us who may have been vaccinated in Sweden, our group immunity is strong.

This UK offered surgery to remove vaccinationsärr. Never in hell that I would take away my: I wear it with pride on the beach (and on the right shoulder blade).

It's proof that I am not sired by idiots.

How Can I Tell If My Shoulder Is Fractured

Prof Victims - The story of She ...

Hon. Is back. It is not really that ominous (it is even a Swedish word?) As it sounds. She is not dangerous. Not even particularly annoying for me personally. But she should not be here and it is she.

She started at the same time as me. She was a bit annoying in that way that you do not really want to admit that you are experiencing. One wants to be a gorgeous girl. Someone who takes on the misfits and so. Anyone who remembers what it was like to be misfit. Someone actually made a lifestyle of always being the one that looks at the current misfits feel welcome in any case. Someone who is willing to take the risk yourself being bullied for the man stands up for the bullied. You want it.


It is not the nasty toys in the picture who has written the letter.

But the risk of that behavior is that there are fifty-fifty between becoming lifelong friends with a grateful misfit who thrives in a single person showed appreciation and that immediately ceases to be a misfit - or at least channel their inability to fit in any socially acceptable nörderi or, more often, get a notice that: it was not me who gave a misfit a chance this time, but it was a happy, funny nerd who took a gamble on the scatter their pearls for me and see if I oink - and to put on a professional victim. A kind of reverse bully who uses his weakness for messing with others and get what they want. I say fifty-fifty, but so far it is four-square between Prof. victims and happy geek surprise of my life. But I see it like this: geek happy surprises do not need me, so they do not seek me out. I must find them. And since I myself am a happy nerd surprise, it's more tentatively how it will work in practice. Withdrawn Withdrawn + = tentative acquaintance. But Prof victims ... They are a different story.

Prof victims, however. They can smell me from a hundred miles away. I'm not saying that the direct booking a ticket and Ryan follows her nose from continent to continent, but if we are in the same context so they attach to me like barnacles (or is it sjöanemoner?) and is stuck until I "make them disappointed." (This has made me deeply suspicious of anyone who actively seek my company. I always have to have a serious conversation with myself about not being afraid to fully normal people who just happen to think that we click.)

Need I say that She followed the archetype and welded themselves onto me from day one? I got on the bus. She was there. Wanted to talk. I did not want to talk. (1.I is a bad conversationalist and it gives me the anxiety of having to carry a conversation. Second I am not a morning person and want to be left alone on the road to work. 3rd I take every chance to read a book, Tomorrow the bus is very suitable for - if I really concentrated on the bus rampage, I would never be able to sleep again. Honestly, what is it with British bus drivers? They all behave like they are the last bus out of Pompeii. Maybe they are trying to run the time so they can have long conversations with people at each stop before they run on?) But you want to be a gorgeous girl. She who takes on those who are a bit anxious.

So, I plutt coated on. As you may remember, Mom, so it was good. I learned at the right pace and receiving encouragement and more difficult tasks of J. I found myself to inform the team discovered that my colleagues were fun (generally) and thrived.

Just as well, it was not for her. One of the problems was that she ... How do I say that? She was not so ... Her intellect was not so suitable for this particular kind of information ... Thus, I would not say that she is sluggish. So I do not think so. But it's her. Sluggish So. Or: her talent profile includes not just the fields necessary for this type of work. What do I know - maybe she is cruel on ukulele or can juggle toilet rolls like a pro? Her home is perhaps a miracle of tasteful furnishings, almost straight out of Wallpaper? Maybe she can dance like Kevin Bacon or write stanzinetter in Sanskrit? I do not know. I just know that she can not be programmed. At all. She has severe problems in understanding even the simplest concepts. She does not remember from one time to a another how she, with great difficulty and very helpful, solved a problem last time. (For about thirty seconds ago).

No, not her either. She read of course, you see well?

But you want to be that girl. So I helped her. I explained. Again. And again. I showed my solutions. I gave her my copy, carefully annotated, programs for self fiddling with them and see. And I'll give her this: she _ville_ understand. She _ville_ do it yourself. She never left the slightly modified versions of my programs as solutions to the data. She did not steal response. But she did not understand why my solution worked and not her. Fast. I. Explained. I was completely cracked at not being able to find a way to explain that went forward. It did not.

probation ended - there was no question about it. She could not continue. She cost the company money. It is supposed to generate them. We are a company - not a sheltered workshop. J was feeling bad. He had worked so hard to get her fit for purpose and provided her with how many extra hours tutoring at any time, at the expense of time he should be spent on projects that lead projects (such as drug money for the com company) - he did his job in the evenings and was her caregiver days. (Nej. She is _verkligen_ not nice, so, yes, it was of his goodness.) The rest of us helped out as best we could. D, C and I. P called in - as homemakers and senior, she was only supposed to clean the project. Just, just programming. But she is so cruel clever and so good at conveying his knowledge to J begged it as a favor to her and she stood up. She also wanted to be that girl. J arranged an extension of the probationary period to give her a chance to catch up. Right against management's wishes. He fought tooth and nail to give her a chance. He justified it by saying that she missed a couple of productive days at the beginning of her IT had tangled. (Everyone's IT struggled incessantly at the beginning. The office was new and the system under-dimensioned) He got what he wanted. She got one last chance to prove that she could understand the most rudimentary features of our work.

She did not, and it was not because of lack of commitment. The whole office was involved in getting her up to scratch. But it did not. The woman has a master's in math but do not understand how to calculate minutes of an hour. She did not SAS-time. What is not working as usual measure of time, but still not difficult to understand: to simplify the kind of arithmetic that the reporting of time requires time is expressed in the SAS as the number of days elapsed since 1 / 1 1960th 2 / 1 in 1960 is therefore 1, 3/1 är dag 2 etc. Dagar som infallit före 1/1 1960 uttrycks som negativa tal. Detta gör det lätt att tex räkna ut hur många dagar som gått sen man tog första dosen av en medicin man testar utan att behöva dividera med 24/60 etc. Det är faktiskt enklare än att jobba med ”normala” tidsangivelser. Så icke för Henne. Det krångliga med det var att Hon inte förstod att även om underliggande data för en viss dag inte såg ut som detta långa tal eftersom någon along the way applied a style to it. Ie, told the system to show it on one of the human brain is easy to understand manner. This SAS is one hundred and first Most people can take this with a little encouragement, even if they have never been close to the statistical programming. Yes, even if they failed math in elementary school completely, so the concept is still understandable. Maybe not for my fuzzy description above, but definitely after that I found and let them try again. I feel _ingen_ who could not understand this (if they only have the stomach concentrate long enough)

Hon. Understood. Not.

But she wanted to work as a programmer. So much in fact that when J with a heavy heart had to give her the news that she would not be permanent, so he could not even begin to say what he would before she interrupted him with "If this does not go as I want, I will notify the bullying has been going on here."

Gobsmacked?

It was we.

Here, however, I shoot in, I should have seen it coming. During one of torture bus trips when we failed by expressing ourselves in English as the second did (let's put it like this: I often get credit for my English is better than the spoken on the BBC. Soooo ... it was not my English was the problem. I think.) so she told me - as if it were completely normal - she cit mt its neighbor. And his landlord. For the landlord had actually beaten her. (I do not think of any more) She was deeply upset that the court did not give her the right.

Whatever is going on in the department, this was not the bullying - more pampering. Rather, affirmative action. Rather sick much support and help. But - a woman of her word, she received the news that the management has decided not to offer her a permanent contract. Went home without saying goodbye and filed official complaints on bullying.

She implied D and C - tried to imply to me, but there was J documentation that she repeatedly expressed how happy and grateful she was for my help so it crapped itself, and asserted in place of HR that the reason it went so well for me with the introductory course was that I had genius for me a record of all data before it began. Why is she not attracted to it on the boys, I have no idea. (Perhaps she did, but I did get of course only know what I was accused of). Since J himself had removed the record-section from the Compendium before he distributed it and had it locked in his desk drawer, he could easily refute that kind of allegations. (When I was at the interview I had to make a technical test on my SAS skills, so it had probably gone to loose anyway, but J suggested as a gladiator for me. Yes: I was a teacher's favorite. Do you have a problem with that?)

process has since gone out for a whole year. Bullying is usually difficult to prove if you really are bullied. But if not, it has been time and energy to obtain a medical certificate that you feel bad - even if the cause can not be proven. In a normal company would have gone like this: HR conduct an investigation. Concludes that the allegations can be substantiated. Insertion that they are would be in trouble if they kick someone after a bullying allegation and buy him out. Probably what she expected. In our business they have instead chosen to keep her (as a probationer) - but it took a year to reach such a point. My theory is: they follow all the rules and laws that are and would rather the major economic blow to have her in Payroll than to "negotiate with terrorists," which probably would be less costly. Counter-claim is that she actually comes in and works, which is the last thing she wants. She has prokrastinerat in one year. Sick Wrote itself. Absent from meetings. Erupted during the negotiations. Everything for them to give up and kick her. Throughout the year, the course has not paid wages, but she has probably been living on the equivalent of the sickness fund (hint: not much stålars) until it became unbearable to live on so little money and she Insa , g that they would not cough up. A common avgångsverderlag usually three months at frivillit redundancy. A Worker's comp can be up to one year's salary. Probably they thought that it is better to give her a chance to become productive, pay a part-time (She's working now only Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday) for three months and then kick her, secure in the knowledge that they are squeaky clean. To amuse himself a bit, they have given her G as immediate superior. G hate her. G is a first-class narcissist, classic bully - perhaps they hope to take two birds with one stone - Maybe they just wanted to mess with G which is now forced to paw at the toe of her, well aware that it could cost him his job to speak up against her. It is wonderful to see. She, had to work with something she can not handle, and he had to suck up to someone who disgusts him - and be accountable for that she learns her job. At first I thought HR was stupid that not only said, "Hey, we have proof that you are lying. Unpack you out of here and forget References: "Now I wonder if there is a nasty streak in our HR department that I, on the one hand not to be left in the firing line for, but on the other hand, currently enjoying the a spectator. I think they have handled this just right. (In my view, that is)

Recommended reading.

Okay. She has lied about me, and if people I like. She has been underestimated my innate intelligence by not being able to think I can understand the things she can not (the only thing she knows about my background is that I am a humanist, and my longest job before this was in kindergarten) - if she, Matt schoolmaster, not fix it - how can the Swede who does not even have math c (that's Number Two high school math for us old-timers.) understand that? No, ruffel and arc must exist. (In a weak moment, she revealed to me - on the bus of course - that it took her five years to meet the three-year training behind her msc, and that her supervisor in practice did the information for her to get rid of her. No, she did not take a sabbatical. She was studying full time for all five years. It is two years of only omtentor. )

Then came the next shocker: she is 45. (She dresses from New Look and TopShop - ie, as a thirteen). She is 45. This is the longest job she ever had and she has spent a total of four months a year here. She has put in systems to fail on things and either get others to do them for her, or meeting people. This is what I mean by typical of a bully who uses his weakness (and other people's kindness) as weapons. One prof victims.

Now she's back. She is doing its best to act victims. She stresses along the walls and staring, staring, staring at people, and not necessarily that she's talking to (she has iofs always done, it was one of the things that immediately PinPoint her as a misfit). She jumps to if someone talks to her. She stopped short as a deer in the truck cease when I say good morning. It's disgusting actually and both insulting and annoying. She knows, as well as I, that I have not bullied her - but on the contrary - so why is she so? Why löjlar she?

Well - well, she must properly maintain the illusion, and partly so: if I had lied about someone, in the belief that a : they would not hear it, and b: I would never see them again, I would have thought it was damn hard to meet them again, given that HR had interview with them and put forward - and been disproved - Every lie. Partly as hell better jump when they kindly say good morning.

I with my fucking mood? Why have I not riveted to her? Well - she has no advantage over me, so why should I care about. She can play their little game if she wants - her lies were toothless and her acting is obvious to all. On the contrary, she gets me to see the damn professional and grown up each time I kindly greet her good morning - and I have the satisfaction of an ever so well-aimed BIFF would never make her less stressed out by her anticipation of the , and the creepy friendliness of a man trying to do really bad. Revenge not only taste better cold, the more protracted it is, the harder it takes.

And whatever how little I want - I'm still that girl. No matter how badly she has behaved, so it gave her no real advantage. She did not achieve what she wanted. She burned the major bridges, and alienated their sole defender, in his wild facts after straw and she is probably sincerely apprehensive about the reaction from them she lied about . She is expected to do a job she can not handle and she knows that she would not have the pay, severance pay or sick leave in a few months. No one in her office like her. They are polite and friendly, but they do not like her and no one wants her there. Every Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday she goes to a job she does not want, and do not want her, trying to do things she just can not handle, along with people who have good reason to be angry at her and no reason to extend a hand as she struggles. She is several thousand mil from her family, she is 45 and too stupid passing a qualifying job, but the snobby to take an unqualified. There is no one like her.

How can I _not_ feel sorry for such a man?