Status Monitor Brother

Men who hate women

The regularity of the writing is not so great. Stupidly enough, not a LiveJournal calculator so you do not know if anyone is reading. Please write a comment to let me know. It is more fun that way, although I mostly write for myself.

So I have been to the movies. Men Who Hate Women, a film by Stieg Larsson's novel of the same name. It was a decent movie. It was so faithful to the book as a movie can be. The book contains enormous amount of detail and a lot of internal monologues, so as to make it fully faithful is of course not. It was basically just a simplification that bothered me: Mikael Blomkvist incentive to finally take the job disappeared and so did perhaps his willingness to resolve the case a bit "out of character". Other things in the film that did not fit with my image, was more because I had imagined Mid different, but the parts were ok.

Actor effort was solid, although I was a bit difficult for both Sven-Bertil Taube and Mikael Nykvist. Nykvist most of the roles he had in recent times and giving stupid associations in certain situations. Those feel-good movies for middle-aged women are a bit creepy. Naomi Rapace effort Lisbeth Salander was very good, especially where there's a physical similarity with the book's description that was striking and a bit sulky, almost Asbergers-like, she did good.

Already in the book bothered me that I Lisbeth using Macintosh computers. Of course it is not film the couple's fault, but it feels not right. No self-respecting hacker would use these admittedly great-looking machines with polished user interface.

Definitely worth seeing, but when you have to pay 110 bucks to go to the movies, you get download will at least two films for compensate for the sugar price. SF, like his claim in advance for that.

Dresses,brlow The Kneee

lundbomikent @ 2009-02-26T18: 12:00

Hi Mom - and any others.

Shawn White replaces still Wii Fit until I got over my aversion to Wiilliam - this proved to be an unconscious genius, because the tight job-pants rod coat HIPC go of her bottom after a few days Snowboarding. However I will try to get over it now. So far I run freely (that is what I feel for instead of following a schedule) because the goal is that I should move on me 40min-1hour each day.

Today, Mom, you should ignore what stari newspapers about the U.S. study on different kinds of diets. Why?

Well, because it is not implemented properly.

For First

None of the groups had a low carbohydrate intake at all. The group with the lowest carbohydrate intake to almost twice as many carbohydrates as the maximum recommended daily intake according to Atkins and / or LCHF. Thus there was no low carbohydrate group in the study.

Secondly

All groups were set at a maximum intake of fats / proteins that are less than recommended under the Atkins / LCHF. Thus there was no högproteingrupp or högfettgrupp with the study.

Thirdly

All groups were assigned an intake of saturated fat in line with today's (contested ) recommendations and was assigned unsaturated fat as the sole source of fat - LCHF question the saturated fat hazards and think it is just the saturated fat that helps high-fettkostätare to lose weight. Thus there was no group that ate enough saturated fat for checking this.

Fourthly,

There was no control group with people who ate 'as usual & rdquo ;. Maybe that if it existed it would have been obvious that the "diet" did not differ significantly from "normal diet" in addition to contain 750kcal (one and a half normal case) less than normal daily intake?

What we have is therefore a study of three-högkolhydrats lågfettgrupper with minimal differences between them that went down pathetic six kg in two of the r by the constant eating under the UN definition of famine. Yep - the three groups ati principle, the same diet. Thus, it is useless to compare them. But credit to participants who bear to live on the breadline in two years to be rewarded to remain above the limit for obesity - obesity as the English term reads. Their dedication has given calorie slimming a fatal blow. The next time a dietitian questions whether you can handle by counting the number of targets you eat in a day, you can only refer to this study. Maxintag on 1400kcal a day and 4-6kg less. In two years.

contrast that with that I went down seven kilograms between Christmas and early February on several hundred kcal _över_ my recommended calorie intake per day. Eriksson refuses to wave, but has gone down a byxstorlek and skjortstorlek. It appears on the face and stomach can I say. As someone who managed to go _upp_ weight by eating less than 800kcal a day so I would call this a modest profit for the results.

Dietary studies are complicated things. For example, they are virtually impossible to do a double-blind. They require so much of the subjects and are extremely costly for those who do study. Nowhere along the road leading to the until some form of medical treatment that can be patented and sold for good money so it is entirely up to interest groups, government institutions - and the food industry - to perform them. Therefore, it is not particularly big surprise that I read in Toxic Epistles that the study's principal name is linked to several major Pharma companies. Now I'm not the one who dissar Pharma. I see every day, important studies on the virtually unknown diseases less than one percent of the world's population - not to mention that they are paying my salary. But if you try skohorna a study to say something it does not say it's good for one's reputation if it is not linked to excessive Mon nga of market stakeholders.

Fifthly

All groups at 750-800kcal less than the recommended daily intake regardless of which diet they followed. LCHF recommends eating a full day's ration of calories or even more for best results. Most LCHF veterans endorse underätning to make the weight loss is slower. Starvation and LCHF are not together.

So what was the researchers' conclusion? Since they were unable to provide proof, even in his incorrectly executed study, the low carbohydrate diet works less than calorie diet they call out jubilantly to the anyway not work BETTER. Despite the fact, nowhere in the study made use of either low-carbohydrate servings or high fat / protein servings. Or included saturated fat in either group.

So instead, they argue that: once you've been bold are out of luck.

Since it does not help to eat less than a Dachau-serving to lose weight so you might as well give a damn about it and concentrate on preventing the next generation from getting fat by pressing them flakes, potatoes, porridge and inflammation-inducing lågfettsmargariner. Whereupon the percentage of those who are genetically predisposed to obesity become obese and will malträterade of nutritionists who INSINUATING hisses "Maybe you safari you more than you think? & Rdquo ;

The icing (useful) on the cake (crap) they dig up Stephan Rössner - the man who has devoted twenty years to fail to lose weight fetton down at the Karolinska Institute - to come up with pledged statements about "logic", "energy in", "energy out" in explaining that it has no specific effect of ä take carbohydrates like - but say that eating low carb.

In cases like that, Rössner, I can tell you that my Snickers-free diet - where I eat eight Snickers between each case, but denies having been in them myself - not the weight loss effect. Next week I will therefore try to eat eight double yep between each goal, pretending that I do not do it, and annoy me that I did not lose weight. I should also start saying I do not use water in the shower and be surprised when I get vati hair. That's one thing that today's retarded journalists do not understand the difficult things that a nice environment on evvidenns, but to call himself a professor and do not have the sense to take even a little look at a study before to pronounce itself in the media is really embarrassing. Fucking clown.

One thing I think a lot about is: anorectics, then? Why do they lose weight when they usually let her only intake consist of just fruit, a box Marabou Milk Chocolate, etc? Well, except that they may have the genetics to lose weight (how much you discover an anorexic who fail to lose weight? It is precisely nah ; are they getting too skinny at ambient realize they need help ...) Then surely it is likely that the incredibly small portions they eat makes them still less than 7 g carbohydrate per day, which means that the are in ketosis anyway. - I have seriously seen these tips from a seventeen year old American anorexics to another on a forum: "Share a half apple into six parts. Spread the gaps throughout the day. Challenge yourself to have a gap left for more every day. "

So I do not want to live, and so I do not want me any related girl should live - or die. But it would obviously Stephan Rössner, and therefore I do not like him. Or Claude Marcus, thinks it is better to give a fourteen year old, a Gastric Bypass, than to let him try to eat carbohydrate-poor, under medical supervision, in a few months .

The dietary guidelines that were prevalent throughout my lifetime is directly harmful to health. It is unethical to report a bad like this study as proof of anything (the only thing it certainly shows is that the calorie diet has very little effect on tra ; nniskor with a predisposition to obesity). Kvällsblaskorna of tomorrow dragons reports the investigation as if it found that low carb would not work. A newspaper put a more conservative line which started from the diet, in general, have limited long-term effect on weight. And that is exactly what the report shows. But those who eat LCHF calorie diets do not, so it is not actually them. This is obviously very difficult to understand.

Is it just me who wish to scientific reporting in the Swedish big media would be made by journalists who have some kind of scientific background? Or at least basic knowledge of the source research? Or as the absolute minimum literacy and a three-year-morality?

So, do not worry mom - the only thing this study shows is that anyone who carried it did not know what were doing.